Re: The Rule of Law under the New Constitution.

Guys, If my brother is going to be the first to be sacrificed so that
this country moves to sanity, i say he should go a head and face the
knife as a brave warrior. In our initiation ceremonies, he becomes
'kiboretiet'. There are no two ways about it now.....he has a case to
answer and he must do just that like you and me. It does not matter
whether it has taken 1 yr or 10 yrs.....down in his heart, he knew
there was going to come a time of reckoning. If he is innocent and he
has the facts, he should not fear because he will be acquited. We
shall support him to overcome it. If he stole, I would not mind if he
goes to jail. I hope the same process will be applied on those who
stole in the Laico Regency, KPC, Foreign affairs etc.

On 10/20/10, Jagem K'Onyiego <jairuschurch@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Ladies and Gentlemen(s)
>
> Since Hon Ruto was told by the Judges that he has a case to answer in Court
> Concerning a parcel of land that he and others participated in selling to a
> certain firm, where the sellers ended up raking Millions of Shillings, money
> that lawfully should not have gone to their pockets, many people have come
> into
> the Forum with Very interesting postings.
>
> A number of them have come with Daggers drawn in defense of Ruto, while
> others
> have posted their thoughts, which clearly show that they are ululating,
> about
> Ruto, a Minister, being brought to answer charges in a Court of Law. While
> this
> has gone on, I see those for and against Ruto, at times to tend to be very
> emotional and passionate. This maybe so, but we must remember that, a few
> things
> have changed since the introduction of the new Constitution.
>
> The New Constitution promised to protect the individual rights of the
> Citizens.
> A section in that Constitution also promises the Citizens that it will fight
> and
> protect them from Corrupt individuals. The Constitution also states clearly,
> that, a person mentioned in a Corruption case, which is before a Court of
> law,
> if that person is holding a Government office, he/she must resign.
>
> The above is what the constitution provides. Now, Ruto's case goes against
> all
> these clauses and therefore what is befalling him is as the Law demands.
> If all Walalahoi and YPs respected the law to be impartial in this New
> Constitutional dispensation, then all should have kept quiet and waited for
> the
> law to take its course. It is only in this way that Sanity will come back to
> Kenya. Haven't the Citizens had enough melodrama, with "Chest thumping
> individuals", who often, operated like they were immune to and above the
> law?
> Would we want that situation to continue or would we want to see some
> sobriety
> about the rule of law set in?
>
> Over to you Forumists
>
> Jagem
>
>
>
>
> --
> TO ADVERTISE HERE, SEND KSH 500 to +254 726 034 530
>
> NEXT SOCIAL MEETUP http://on.fb.me/dafJDE
>
> TECHMTAA BLOG: http://www.techmtaa.com/
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, Email mlalahoi+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
>
> Websites for Ksh 10,000? Email robertnng@gmail.com
>

--
TO ADVERTISE HERE, SEND KSH 500 to +254 726 034 530

NEXT SOCIAL MEETUP http://on.fb.me/dafJDE

TECHMTAA BLOG: http://www.techmtaa.com/

To unsubscribe from this group, Email mlalahoi+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com

Websites for Ksh 10,000? Email robertnng@gmail.com